Maoinithe ag an Aontas Eorpach. Mar sin féin is tuairimí agus tuairimí an údair amháin nó na n-údar amháin iad na tuairimí agus na tuairimí a nochtar agus ní gá go léiríonn siad tuairimí an Aontais Eorpaigh nó na Gníomhaireachta Eorpaí Feidhmiúcháin Oideachais agus Cultúir (EACEA). Ní fhéadfar an tAontas Eorpach ná EACEA a chur i gcuntas astu. Uimhir an tionscadail: 2023-1-NL01-KA220-HED-000155675. - Guidelines per target group: Students https://www.kuleuven.be/english/education/student/educational-tools/generativeartificial-intelligence Teaching Staff https://www.kuleuven.be/english/education/leuvenlearninglab/support/highlighted/ge nerative-artificial-intelligence Researchers https://research.kuleuven.be/en/integrity-ethics/integrity/practices/genai/genAI Reference styles when using GenAI: https://bib.kuleuven.be/english/training-and-tutorials/citation/refering-to-genai Lessons learned The primary lesson from KU Leuven is that large, research-intensive universities should embrace rather than ban GenAI, shifting the focus toward “responsible and critical use” by all members of the academic community. Implications for practice The guidelines and resources offered by this case study can be taken as a model for the use of GenAI tools in higher education (as an alternative of banning the GenAI tools).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NzYwNDE=