Maoinithe ag an Aontas Eorpach. Mar sin féin is tuairimí agus tuairimí an údair amháin nó na n-údar amháin iad na tuairimí agus na tuairimí a nochtar agus ní gá go léiríonn siad tuairimí an Aontais Eorpaigh nó na Gníomhaireachta Eorpaí Feidhmiúcháin Oideachais agus Cultúir (EACEA). Ní fhéadfar an tAontas Eorpach ná EACEA a chur i gcuntas astu. Uimhir an tionscadail: 2023-1-NL01-KA220-HED-000155675. Aim: 1) To explore the creative potential of AI systems, such as ChatGPT, for the development of writing in educational contexts; 2) To investigate how AI can be used as a supportive tool for students when performing writing tasks. Target group: The research involved both AI systems and university students as participants. Description of case Overview: Creativity assessment tool: They chose the Test of Creative Imagination for Adults (PIC-A) to evaluate creative abilities. AI participants: The research focused on Large Language Models (LLMs) built on OpenAI's GPT-3 technology. The authors analysed the responses of 20 different AI tools, including well-known ones like ChatGPT and Dupla.ai. Human participants: University students participated alongside the AI systems. They completed the same PIC-A tasks, allowing for a direct comparison of human and AI creativity. Impact of AI on student writing: The researchers assessed student writing abilities in two phases: Pre-test: Students completed the PIC-A tasks without any assistance from AI tools. This established a baseline for their writing skills; Posttest: Students tackled the PIC-A tasks again, but this time, they were allowed to use ChatGPT to brainstorm ideas and improve their writing. Analysis: The authors compared the creative outputs from the AI systems and the human participants on the PIC-A test. They also analysed how using ChatGPT in the post-test impacted student writing compared to the pre-test results. Lessons learned AI's strengths: -The study demonstrated AI's prowess in idea generation and its ability to enhance writing quality. -Its effectiveness was particularly noticeable in tasks requiring practical solutions or applications. Human vs. AI creativity: - Both AI and humans demonstrated specific strengths in creativity. - AI systems excel when processing and utilising vast amounts of data. - Humans proved superior in navigating abstract concepts, imaginative thinking, and handling scenarios that are more theoretical. AI as a tool for students: - Utilising ChatGPT resulted in a significant improvement in the writing abilities of the student participants.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NzYwNDE=