Maoinithe ag an Aontas Eorpach. Mar sin féin is tuairimí agus tuairimí an údair amháin nó na n-údar amháin iad na tuairimí agus na tuairimí a nochtar agus ní gá go léiríonn siad tuairimí an Aontais Eorpaigh nó na Gníomhaireachta Eorpaí Feidhmiúcháin Oideachais agus Cultúir (EACEA). Ní fhéadfar an tAontas Eorpach ná EACEA a chur i gcuntas astu. Uimhir an tionscadail: 2023-1-NL01-KA220-HED-000155675. Description of case AI tools are constantly being released into the public domain. As with all new technological innovations, this brings a range of opportunities and challenges for education: primarily for educators and learners. There is an increasing interest in the academic community and beyond to use AI in Education (AIED) to generate content. This presents opportunities and challenges for academic and research integrity. ENAI presents a set of recommendations with the aim of supporting academics, researchers and other educational stakeholders, including students’ organisations, on the ethical use of AI tools. The recommendations focus on the importance of equipping stakeholders with the skills and knowledge to use AI tools ethically and the need to develop and implement relevant educational policies addressing the opportunities and challenges posed by AIED. Lessons learned All persons, sources, and tools that influence the ideas or generate the content should be properly acknowledged. Consequently, when an AI tool is used, it should be acknowledged. The acknowledgement may be done in different ways, according to the context, the institutional policies or other requirements. When possible, the input given to the AI tool should be specified. Appropriate use of services, sources, and tools that only influence the form is generally acceptable (e.g. proof-readers, proofreading tools, spelling checkers, thesaurus). An AI tool cannot be listed as a co-author in a publication as it cannot take responsibility for the content and findings reported. The person (human being or legal entity) is always accountable for the content, whether or not it was generated by AI (see COPE Guidelines for Authorship and AI by Levene 2023). The outputs of AI tools can include biassed, inaccurate, or incorrect content that users should be aware of. This may be caused by bias in training data, algorithms, filters, etc. It is important to include information about AI in education for all students and in training for teachers. If students do not have the opportunity to learn about the ethical use of AI, they will be more susceptible to engaging in inappropriate use of AI, which may constitute academic misconduct. Students should be included and educated on the following: The purpose of all activities related to learning and assessment and why they should develop (e.g. write) their individual/group work assignments. How to develop their ethical writing and content production skills. Teachers should receive training on ethical use of AI including development of relevant learning outcomes, learning activities, and assessment strategies.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NzYwNDE=