Maoinithe ag an Aontas Eorpach. Mar sin féin is tuairimí agus tuairimí an údair amháin nó na n-údar amháin iad na tuairimí agus na tuairimí a nochtar agus ní gá go léiríonn siad tuairimí an Aontais Eorpaigh nó na Gníomhaireachta Eorpaí Feidhmiúcháin Oideachais agus Cultúir (EACEA). Ní fhéadfar an tAontas Eorpach ná EACEA a chur i gcuntas astu. Uimhir an tionscadail: 2023-1-NL01-KA220-HED-000155675. University/ HEI: Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, ANA Futura, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden Course and subject domain: Microbial pathogenesis for dental students Aim: To compare the ability of GPT-3.5 and teachers to answer questions from dental students and construct detailed intended learning outcomes. Target group: Students during their third semester at Karolinska Institutet, Sweden in September 2022. Description of case AI tool used: ChatGPT 3.5 A detailed description of what happened: The questions from the students and replies from the teachers were obtained from an online discussion forum during the course. The teachers were at the time unaware that their answers would be used in the current study. The same questions were administered to GPT-3.5 in May 2023. The 7 different intended learning outcomes were individually supplied to GPT-3.5, with a prompt to create new detailed intended learning outcomes for each individual intended learning outcome. The intended learning outcomes created by GPT-3.5 were subsequently compared to the detailed intended learning outcomes created for the course in 2022 by teachers. The questions were asked by 22 dental students who took the course on microbial pathogenesis in September 2022. The questions were mainly of the second-order category. One teacher replied to all questions initially, and 2 other teachers retrospectively reviewed the initial teacher’s responses during March/April 2023. There were 7 intended learning outcomes in the microbial pathogenesis course. There were no exclusion criteria; thus, all questions and intended learning outcomes were included. The same questions and intended learning outcomes were asked to GPT-3.5 in May 2023. Lessons learned GPT-3.5 had the ability to interpret questions from students and give concise and correct facts in response, and in most of the replies (73%), the answers were longer than the teacher’s reply. Furthermore, GPT-3.5 was able to construct detailed intended learning outcomes although these were very extensive and, in some cases, even misleading. Implications for practice GPT-3.5’s knowledge, interpretation, and ability to answer students’ questions in microbiology were found to be comparable to those of a teacher. However, GPT3.5 is hampered by its instructions to be pleasant to the reader and it requires knowledge to really know if a given answer is correct. GPT-3.5 lacks knowledge in
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NzYwNDE=