Με τη χρηματοδότηση της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης. Οι απόψεις και οι γνώμες που διατυπώνονται εκφράζουν αποκλειστικά τις απόψεις των συντακτών και δεν αντιπροσωπεύουν κατ'ανάγκη τις απόψεις της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης ή του Ευρωπαϊκού Εκτελεστικού Οργανισμού Εκπαίδευσης και Πολιτισμού (EACEA). Η Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση και ο EACEA δεν μπορούν να θεωρηθούν υπεύθυνοι για τις εκφραζόμενες απόψεις. Lessons learned Teachers/ trainers and researchers both play essential roles by offering valuable insights and contributing to the collaborative design of AI tools as developed by EdTech companies, aiming to enhance their user-friendliness and utility. Furthermore, when teachers/trainers, researchers and software providers collaborate, it enhances the validity of their findings, especially when innovations are evaluated by teachers/trainers within the authentic context of a classroom. This in vivo approach allows for a deeper understanding of the impact of AI tools on teaching and learning, considering the rich and complex dynamics of the classroom environment. Additionally, government-led initiatives can provide essential support to provide guidelines and professionalisation opportunities with regard to design, development and implementation. In sum, the collaboration between educational stakeholders holds significant value and is highly regarded: by sharing knowledge, designing interventions together, and engaging in ongoing dialogue, more evidence-based AI-tools can be developed which are relevant, applicable and valorised in real-world educational settings. Fostering collaboration between schools, companies, researchers and policymakers will become increasingly important for sustainable growth. Only within a shared vision and constructive dialogue about responsible AI use, teachers/ trainers and learners can be empowered to actively shape their educational paths in education and training contexts. Above all, a realistic approach is needed with regards to AIED. Neither naivety nor scepticism will futureproof our attitude towards innovation. AI is here to stay, with every risk and opportunity in full effect immediately upon release. The only truly impactful way will be forward! Moving ahead, we need to raise awareness and empowerment about privacy and ethics concerning the use of AI, demand main actors’ agency within the teaching/training and learning environment (i.e. teachers/trainers and learners) and incentivise explain ability within artificially intelligent systems that can be used in both formal and informal educational settings. Only then will we be able to go digital while simultaneously staying human. Implications for practice N/A Μελέτη περίπτωσης 30: Συστάσεις της ENAI σχετικά με τη δεοντολογική χρήση της ΤΝ στην εκπαίδευση. General information Reference/Source: Foltynek, T., Bjelobaba, S., Glendinning, I. et al. ENAI Recommendations on the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Int J Educ Integr 19, 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4 The European Network for Academic Integrity is an association gathering educational institutions and individuals interested in maintaining and promoting academic integrity. Description of case AI tools are constantly being released into the public domain. As with all new technological innovations, this brings a range of opportunities and challenges for education: primarily for educators and learners. There is an increasing interest in the academic community and beyond to use AI in Education (AIED) to generate content. This presents opportunities and challenges for academic and research integrity. ENAI presents a set of recommendations with the aim of supporting academics, researchers and other educational stakeholders, including students’ organisations, on the ethical use of AI tools. The recommendations focus on the importance of equipping stakeholders with the skills and knowledge to use AI tools ethically and the need to
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NzYwNDE=